Should third-party liability insurance be removed?      

Updated Jul 16, 2021 | Same topic: Latest Consumer Reports

One government executive seems to think so. 

Getting the car that you want marks the beginning of an ownership experience that places a premium on responsibility, one of the more important aspects of which is protection in the form of auto insurance.  

Man signing papers

Protecting your car is usually as simple as signing a piece of paper

When talking about cars, insurance coverage takes on two forms: there’s the comprehensive insurance and the third-party liability insurance or TPL. Compared to the former, the latter involves a shorter list of instances to provide monetary compensation for. The TPL has always formed part of the requirements that motorists comply with for vehicle registration renewal, being mandated by law.  

That may soon change if the Anti-Red Tape Authority (ARTA) had its way, with ARTA Secretary Jeremiah Belgica proposing that the TPL insurance requirement be waived for vehicles that already have comprehensive coverage. He cited the need to streamline the registration process and ease the financial costs on vehicle owners, adding that the TPL is one of the services offered by fixers, which ARTA is campaigning against.   

Pedestrian

Third-party liability insurance or TPL mainly benefits unsuspecting victims such as pedestrians

According to Atty. Dennis Funa of the Insurance Commission, comprehensive motor insurance already includes TPL, along with Voluntary Third-Party Liability (VTPL) for excess bodily injury, covering expenses that would otherwise exceed the TPL’s coverage limit.

Among these expenses are medical bills for the victim’s hospital confinement, follow-up care and related medical treatment; lost income opportunities if the accident resulted in disability or dismemberment that impaired the victim’s ability to pursue gainful employment; funeral costs if the accident resulted in death; and legal fees should the victims or their families decide to file a suit.    

Damaged car

TPL offers no coverage for vehicle damage or theft

Doing away with the TPL brings down the costs of registration somewhat (up to Php 650 on private vehicles and Php 1,300 for heavy trucks). This represents a boon for many motorists who regard the TPL’s coverage as redundant, given that its provisions are already contained within comprehensive insurance policies. 

For those who are unwilling to shoulder the expenses of comprehensive auto insurance, the TPL is still available, although they will have to live with the limitations as it does not cover vehicle theft, damage, or destruction. Are you in favor of waiving the TPL for comprehensive insurance policy holders? 

Keep up with motoring and transport-related issues at Philkotse.com.

Joseph Paolo Estabillo

Joseph Paolo Estabillo

Author

Joseph holds a degree in Journalism from the University of the Philippines Diliman and has been writing professionally since 1999. He has written episodes for CNN Philippines' motoring show Drive, and has worked on corporate projects for MG Philippines and Pilipinas Shell. Aside from being Philkotse.com’s Content Lead, he also writes content for numerous car dealerships in the U.S., spanning multiple brands such as Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Maserati, among others.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kapatilya

View more